FRAM PH3562 vs NAPA Gold 1626: Oil Filter Compatibility

Compare FRAM PH3562 and NAPA Gold 1626 oil filters by compatibility, dimensions, thread size, gasket fit, bypass valve, anti-drainback valve status, and match confidence. Use this comparison as a fitment review, not as an automatic substitution guarantee. Both use a M20x1.5 thread.

Quick verdict

COMPATIBLEMatch score: 84

Closest known dimensional difference: height -3.8 mm. Verify application-specific requirements before substituting.

  • Thread size is the first hard-fit check for any comparison of spin-on filters.
  • Gasket OD and gasket ID are the most important seal-related dimensions.
  • Height differences can matter for clearance even when thread and gasket fit appear close.
  • Bypass and anti-drainback differences may be important, depending on the application.

FRAM PH3562 and NAPA Gold 1626 specifications

How matching is scored
Specification
FRAM PH3562
NAPA Gold 1626
Thread sizeM20X1,5M20x1.5
Gasket OD71 mm72 mm
Gasket ID62 mm63 mm
Can OD78 mm93.04 mm
Height93 mm96.82 mm
Internal bypass valveYesYes
Bypass PSID128 - 11
Anti-drainback valveYesYes

What matters in this specific comparison

Thread size matches: both are M20x1.5.

Gasket OD differs by 1 mm (FRAM PH3562: 71 mm, NAPA Gold 1626: 72 mm).

Gasket ID differs by 1 mm (FRAM PH3562: 62 mm, NAPA Gold 1626: 63 mm).

NAPA Gold 1626 is 3.8 mm taller (FRAM PH3562: 93 mm, NAPA Gold 1626: 96.82 mm) -- check clearance before substituting.

Can OD differs by 15 mm (FRAM PH3562: 78 mm, NAPA Gold 1626: 93.04 mm).

Both open their bypass valve in a comparable range: FRAM PH3562 at 12-12 psi, NAPA Gold 1626 at 8-11 psi -- these ranges do not overlap.

Open related filters

Before substituting, verify thread fit, gasket sealing dimensions, height clearance, bypass behavior, and anti-drainback requirements for your specific application.

PH3562 vs 1626 Oil Filter Comparison | Filter-Match