FRAM PH2862C vs NAPA Gold 1037: Oil Filter Compatibility
Compare FRAM PH2862C and NAPA Gold 1037 oil filters by compatibility, dimensions, thread size, gasket fit, bypass valve, anti-drainback valve status, and match confidence. Use this comparison as a fitment review, not as an automatic substitution guarantee. Both use a M18x1.5 thread.
Quick verdict
Bypass presence unknown on one or both filters
- Thread size is the first hard-fit check for any comparison of spin-on filters.
- Gasket OD and gasket ID are the most important seal-related dimensions.
- Height differences can matter for clearance even when thread and gasket fit appear close.
- Bypass and anti-drainback differences may be important, depending on the application.
FRAM PH2862C and NAPA Gold 1037 specifications
How matching is scored| Specification | FRAM PH2862C | NAPA Gold 1037 |
|---|---|---|
| Thread size | M18X1,5 | M18x1.5 |
| Gasket OD | 71 mm | 70.1 mm |
| Gasket ID | 62 mm | 62.5 mm |
| Can OD | 93 mm | 93.73 mm |
| Height | 143 mm | 82.55 mm |
| Internal bypass valve | Yes | Unknown |
| Bypass PSID | 12 | Unknown |
| Anti-drainback valve | Yes | Yes |
What matters in this specific comparison
Thread size matches: both are M18x1.5.
Gasket OD differs by 0.9 mm (FRAM PH2862C: 71 mm, NAPA Gold 1037: 70.1 mm).
Gasket ID differs by 0.5 mm (FRAM PH2862C: 62 mm, NAPA Gold 1037: 62.5 mm).
FRAM PH2862C is 60.4 mm taller (FRAM PH2862C: 143 mm, NAPA Gold 1037: 82.55 mm) -- check clearance before substituting.
Can OD differs by 0.7 mm (FRAM PH2862C: 93 mm, NAPA Gold 1037: 93.73 mm).
Open related filters
Before substituting, verify thread fit, gasket sealing dimensions, height clearance, bypass behavior, and anti-drainback requirements for your specific application.