ACDelco PF52 vs NAPA Gold 1190: Oil Filter Compatibility
Compare ACDelco PF52 and NAPA Gold 1190 oil filters by compatibility, dimensions, thread size, gasket fit, bypass valve, anti-drainback valve status, and match confidence. Use this comparison as a fitment review, not as an automatic substitution guarantee. Both use a M18x1.5 thread.
Quick verdict
Both use a M18x1.5 thread.
- Thread size is the first hard-fit check for any comparison of spin-on filters.
- Gasket OD and gasket ID are the most important seal-related dimensions.
- Height differences can matter for clearance even when thread and gasket fit appear close.
- Bypass and anti-drainback differences may be important, depending on the application.
ACDelco PF52 and NAPA Gold 1190 specifications
How matching is scored| Specification | ACDelco PF52 | NAPA Gold 1190 |
|---|---|---|
| Thread size | M18x1.5 | M18x1.5 |
| Gasket OD | 70 mm | 69.6 mm |
| Gasket ID | 61 mm | 60.2 mm |
| Can OD | 76.2 mm | 75.77 mm |
| Height | 127 mm | 119.5 mm |
| Internal bypass valve | No | Yes |
| Bypass PSID | Not applicable | 13 - 19 |
| Anti-drainback valve | Yes | Yes |
What matters in this specific comparison
Thread size matches: both are M18x1.5.
Gasket OD differs by 0.4 mm (ACDelco PF52: 70 mm, NAPA Gold 1190: 69.6 mm).
Gasket ID differs by 0.8 mm (ACDelco PF52: 61 mm, NAPA Gold 1190: 60.2 mm).
ACDelco PF52 is 7.5 mm taller (ACDelco PF52: 127 mm, NAPA Gold 1190: 119.5 mm) -- check clearance before substituting.
Can OD differs by 0.4 mm (ACDelco PF52: 76.2 mm, NAPA Gold 1190: 75.77 mm).
Bypass valve presence differs: NAPA Gold 1190 has one, ACDelco PF52 does not.
Open related filters
Before substituting, verify thread fit, gasket sealing dimensions, height clearance, bypass behavior, and anti-drainback requirements for your specific application.