ACDelco PF52 vs FRAM PH4701: Oil Filter Compatibility
Compare ACDelco PF52 and FRAM PH4701 oil filters by compatibility, dimensions, thread size, gasket fit, bypass valve, anti-drainback valve status, and match confidence. Use this comparison as a fitment review, not as an automatic substitution guarantee. Both use a M18x1.5 thread.
Quick verdict
Candidate adds internal bypass; usually redundant with engine-mounted bypass
- Thread size is the first hard-fit check for any comparison of spin-on filters.
- Gasket OD and gasket ID are the most important seal-related dimensions.
- Height differences can matter for clearance even when thread and gasket fit appear close.
- Bypass and anti-drainback differences may be important, depending on the application.
ACDelco PF52 and FRAM PH4701 specifications
How matching is scored| Specification | ACDelco PF52 | FRAM PH4701 |
|---|---|---|
| Thread size | M18x1.5 | M18X1,5 |
| Gasket OD | 70 mm | 72 mm |
| Gasket ID | 61 mm | 62 mm |
| Can OD | 76.2 mm | 76 mm |
| Height | 127 mm | 120 mm |
| Internal bypass valve | No | Yes |
| Bypass PSID | Not applicable | 12 |
| Anti-drainback valve | Yes | Yes |
What matters in this specific comparison
Thread size matches: both are M18x1.5.
Gasket OD differs by 2 mm (ACDelco PF52: 70 mm, FRAM PH4701: 72 mm).
Gasket ID differs by 1 mm (ACDelco PF52: 61 mm, FRAM PH4701: 62 mm).
ACDelco PF52 is 7 mm taller (ACDelco PF52: 127 mm, FRAM PH4701: 120 mm) -- check clearance before substituting.
Can OD differs by 0.2 mm (ACDelco PF52: 76.2 mm, FRAM PH4701: 76 mm).
Bypass valve presence differs: FRAM PH4701 has one, ACDelco PF52 does not.
Open related filters
Before substituting, verify thread fit, gasket sealing dimensions, height clearance, bypass behavior, and anti-drainback requirements for your specific application.