FRAM PH6811 vs WIX WL10111

FRAM PH6811 and WIX WL10111 are commonly compared by buyers looking for a close replacement. This page compares their published specifications so you can quickly see where they align, where they differ, and whether either filter looks like the better fit for your application.

Quick verdict

SAFEScore: 95

These filters may still be worth comparing, but thread fit, gasket sealing dimensions, height clearance, bypass behavior, and anti-drainback requirements should be reviewed before substitution.

  • Thread size is the first hard-fit check for any comparison of spin-on filters.
  • Gasket OD and gasket ID are the most important seal-related dimensions.
  • Height differences can matter for clearance even when thread and gasket fit appear close.
  • Bypass and anti-drainback differences may be important, depending on the application.

FRAM PH6811 and WIX WL10111 specifications

Specification
FRAM PH6811
WIX WL10111
Thread sizeM20X1,5M20x1.5
Gasket OD63 mm63 mm
Gasket ID52 mm52 mm
Can OD68 mm68 mm
Height85 mm85 mm
Internal bypass valveYesYes
Bypass PSID1214
Anti-drainback valveYesYes
ID topUnknownUnknown
ID bottomUnknownUnknown

What matters most in this comparison?

Thread match: A direct spin-on substitute starts with the same thread size. If the threads differ, the comparison stops there.

Gasket fit: Even when thread size matches, the gasket outside diameter and inside diameter still control whether the filter seals safely against the mounting surface.

Height difference: Small height differences may be acceptable, but longer filters can create clearance problems in tighter installations.

Valve behavior: Bypass and anti-drainback differences can matter in real-world service, especially on cold start or in applications sensitive to oil drain-back.

Related filter pages

Before substituting, verify thread fit, gasket sealing dimensions, height clearance, bypass behavior, and anti-drainback requirements for your specific application.