Fleetguard LF779 vs ACDelco PF52E: Oil Filter Compatibility

Compare Fleetguard LF779 and ACDelco PF52E oil filters by compatibility, dimensions, thread size, gasket fit, bypass valve, anti-drainback valve status, and match confidence. Use this comparison as a fitment review, not as an automatic substitution guarantee. Both use a M18x1.5 thread.

Quick verdict

RISKY

Both use a M18x1.5 thread.

  • Thread size is the first hard-fit check for any comparison of spin-on filters.
  • Gasket OD and gasket ID are the most important seal-related dimensions.
  • Height differences can matter for clearance even when thread and gasket fit appear close.
  • Bypass and anti-drainback differences may be important, depending on the application.

Fleetguard LF779 and ACDelco PF52E specifications

How matching is scored
Specification
Fleetguard LF779
ACDelco PF52E
Thread sizeM18x1.5M18x1.5
Gasket OD71.88 mm70 mm
Gasket ID62.48 mm61 mm
Can OD76 mm84.14 mm
Height117 mm111.12 mm
Internal bypass valveNoNo
Bypass PSIDNot applicableNot applicable
Anti-drainback valveNoYes

What matters in this specific comparison

Thread size matches: both are M18x1.5.

Gasket OD differs by 1.9 mm (Fleetguard LF779: 71.88 mm, ACDelco PF52E: 70 mm).

Gasket ID differs by 1.5 mm (Fleetguard LF779: 62.48 mm, ACDelco PF52E: 61 mm).

Fleetguard LF779 is 5.9 mm taller (Fleetguard LF779: 117 mm, ACDelco PF52E: 111.12 mm) -- check clearance before substituting.

Can OD differs by 8.1 mm (Fleetguard LF779: 76 mm, ACDelco PF52E: 84.14 mm).

Anti-drainback valve differs: ACDelco PF52E has one, Fleetguard LF779 does not.

Open related filters

Before substituting, verify thread fit, gasket sealing dimensions, height clearance, bypass behavior, and anti-drainback requirements for your specific application.

LF779 vs PF52E Oil Filter Comparison | Filter-Match