Baldwin BT112 vs NAPA Gold 1049: Oil Filter Compatibility
Compare Baldwin BT112 and NAPA Gold 1049 oil filters by compatibility, dimensions, thread size, gasket fit, bypass valve, anti-drainback valve status, and match confidence. Use this comparison as a fitment review, not as an automatic substitution guarantee. Both use a 13/16-16 thread.
Quick verdict
Bypass presence unknown on one or both filters · ADBV unknown on one or both filters
- Thread size is the first hard-fit check for any comparison of spin-on filters.
- Gasket OD and gasket ID are the most important seal-related dimensions.
- Height differences can matter for clearance even when thread and gasket fit appear close.
- Bypass and anti-drainback differences may be important, depending on the application.
Baldwin BT112 and NAPA Gold 1049 specifications
How matching is scored| Specification | Baldwin BT112 | NAPA Gold 1049 |
|---|---|---|
| Thread size | 13/16-16 | 13/16-16 |
| Gasket OD | 71.4 mm | 70.4 mm |
| Gasket ID | 62.7 mm | 62.2 mm |
| Can OD | 93.7 mm | 92.96 mm |
| Height | 136.5 mm | 131.5 mm |
| Internal bypass valve | Yes | Unknown |
| Bypass PSID | 8 | Unknown |
| Anti-drainback valve | No | Unknown |
What matters in this specific comparison
Thread size matches: both are 13/16-16.
Gasket OD differs by 1 mm (Baldwin BT112: 71.4 mm, NAPA Gold 1049: 70.4 mm).
Gasket ID differs by 0.5 mm (Baldwin BT112: 62.7 mm, NAPA Gold 1049: 62.2 mm).
Baldwin BT112 is 5 mm taller (Baldwin BT112: 136.5 mm, NAPA Gold 1049: 131.5 mm) -- check clearance before substituting.
Can OD differs by 0.7 mm (Baldwin BT112: 93.7 mm, NAPA Gold 1049: 92.96 mm).
Open related filters
Before substituting, verify thread fit, gasket sealing dimensions, height clearance, bypass behavior, and anti-drainback requirements for your specific application.