ACDelco PF52E vs Baldwin B195: Oil Filter Compatibility
Compare ACDelco PF52E and Baldwin B195 oil filters by compatibility, dimensions, thread size, gasket fit, bypass valve, anti-drainback valve status, and match confidence. Use this comparison as a fitment review, not as an automatic substitution guarantee. Both use a M18x1.5 thread.
Quick verdict
Closest known dimensional difference: height -22.2 mm. Verify application-specific requirements before substituting.
- Thread size is the first hard-fit check for any comparison of spin-on filters.
- Gasket OD and gasket ID are the most important seal-related dimensions.
- Height differences can matter for clearance even when thread and gasket fit appear close.
- Bypass and anti-drainback differences may be important, depending on the application.
ACDelco PF52E and Baldwin B195 specifications
How matching is scored| Specification | ACDelco PF52E | Baldwin B195 |
|---|---|---|
| Thread size | M18x1.5 | M18x1.5 |
| Gasket OD | 70 mm | 70 mm |
| Gasket ID | 61 mm | 61 mm |
| Can OD | 84.14 mm | 79.4 mm |
| Height | 111.12 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Internal bypass valve | No | No |
| Bypass PSID | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| Anti-drainback valve | Yes | Yes |
What matters in this specific comparison
Thread size matches: both are M18x1.5.
Gasket OD is identical at 70 mm.
Gasket ID is identical at 61 mm.
ACDelco PF52E is 22.2 mm taller (ACDelco PF52E: 111.12 mm, Baldwin B195: 88.9 mm) -- check clearance before substituting.
Can OD differs by 4.7 mm (ACDelco PF52E: 84.14 mm, Baldwin B195: 79.4 mm).
Open related filters
Before substituting, verify thread fit, gasket sealing dimensions, height clearance, bypass behavior, and anti-drainback requirements for your specific application.